Section 3 is what got me most perplexed, so it is where I
want to start. I read through the transcript of the “Don’t Lecture Me” series
(since I’m better with the written work than the spoken word) and thought that
this really illustrates the push-pull of high school teaching. I am supposed to
get my students college ready with reading and writing in my subject area.
There are curriculum topics I have to get to and assignments that must be
given. I know that what college is like for a learner. At that same college I
studied what it means to teach. These are not coordinating or collaborating
ideas. They are currently at fundamental odds with each other. So I have tried
in my 6 years teaching to mix it up. I lecture. My students would say a lot. I
also try to ask them to peer review, find their sub topics in a unit to write their
papers on, find more interesting books or articles as well as create projects
and visuals to use different parts of their brain. I’ve seen it as 60/40 mix.
In ninth grade, 60% of what I do needs to be about them as learners and about
40% needs to be about where I need to get them to get through high school
history content and ready for the next grade, whether they like it or not. In
11th grade, it is already shifting. 60% is about being college ready
and maybe 40% about them as learners because from what I saw when I was there
and hear from former students, college will not care. They will spit out
information and expect you to do the rest on your own. If my job is to teach,
then I should not care about what college looks like. Just teach the bright and
shiny kids I have in my room. But if my job is to at all bridge that gap, then
some of what I do needs to be like what college does. Otherwise, the bright and
shiny kids will not be prepared to figure out how they work in this system. I
wish this was shorter. I may look into adapting it to use with my juniors
because they are caught in the middle. I am sure that they wish they could
experience more of that kind of teaching because these are not AP classes that
I am teaching. But the reality is the next academic world they go into will not
be that kind, so how should we operate in our classroom? Teach them in the more
peer review method or more like college or something in between? The people advocating
this change at the college level follow their beliefs with the expectations
that change is not coming that soon, so my current students are going to need
to continue to deal and be prepared for this imperfect system
Section 2: I found the website very user friendly and good
to know for the future if I have questions, but nothing popped out at me. I
clicked on a few different things and skimmed through. I feel like it is a
great place to send parents, especially of younger kids.
Section 1: I was pleased I was able to do some real concrete
work for class. I was able to integrate a potential blog into my class as a
landing pad for my student choice book reviews, with the potential for more
tech in video minis to go with it if I can get to the technology to do that.
Blogging book review I know I can make happen with the labs my school currently
has. I spent a lot of time writing out a proposal attempt so I can talk with my
principal about begging and borrowing my way to increases computers in my room
up from one. I have one very active plan for going forward into the school year
and that makes me feel much, much better about things.
90/90/90 study might be interesting to look at:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.gvsu.edu/cms3/assets/8D75A61E-920B-A470-F74EFFF5D49C6AC0/forms/boardmembers/resources/high_performance_in_high_poverty_schools.pdf
check twitter for #sschat
ReplyDeleteand
http://sschat.ning.com
Never know!
The #sschat is great - it their a way to subscribe to a search? I tried saving it, but then I can't seem to find it again. There some great resources that popped up right away.
ReplyDeleteThe 90/90/90 study was interesting. I definitely try to push reading and writing. Not such much with math - I leave a lot of that to the professionals. :)