One day down. I don’t know that I am any clearer on where I
am going to end up at the end of the week. I’m definitely a structure kind of
girl and I honestly felt frustrated to not be walking away with something
tangible. I have the starts of several ideas, but feel a real disconnect of how
to see them in action in my classroom at my school.
For example, Dan Meyer’s presentation was engaging and
offered an intriguing challenge to educators to find perplexity and use that to
engage students. It sounds to me like another way of approaching the backward
by design model of knowing where you need to end and working back from there.
Seeing the potential for the real world impact of what they are learning and
using that to hook them in. Great. I was impressed to see the way he could find
those connections and what he could turn into a useful and challenging lesson.
What I was disappointed to see was the reliance on individual technology. He
stated he is in Silicon Valley and that all his students have access to iPhones
to do this work on, as does he. I do not. Many of my students do not either.
From what I’ve seen, that can cause real tension for students. Among friends,
sharing is easy. Classrooms of teenagers are not full of friends who will just
share something that is precious to them. I feel like I’ve cycled back around
in frustration. Certainly, there are some positive takeaways or reminders.
Putting questions to the students, to increase their engagement rather than
just listing expectations. But it does not address what is one of the biggest
issues in education. Poverty. My school and my students do not have these kinds
of resources. Some do, but I do not want to create further divides in a
classroom of the haves and have nots. Technology for me needs to be something
that all of my kids have access to, reasonably.
One of my ideas from today, after reading through articles
linked through Twitter, is for the students’ first writing piece to be a
response to text to this article on the government’s plan to study theeffectiveness of Khan Academy.
Their response will be to address the role of technology is education as a
whole, in their specific education and then advocate for or against a class
blog. I am hoping that by putting it in their hands, even if they are lacking
in technology they will feel more invested in this way. I will also try to have
the students evaluate it during the semester to make sure that it is still useful.
There is too much to get through to keep using something clunky.
So that is my start so far. I really wish I something more
concrete to take away. I can see the potential from Twitter as a resource, but
for now it is just sort of a list of more things to read and thing about. I
went for a bike ride after class because I wanted to something tangible. Right
now the class work feels like a bunch of hypotheticals – I could have students
take pictures of what they are doing while working; I could have students post
links through a class Twitter feed. I just don’t know that can translate when
resources are inconsistent and spotty.
In class we didn't get too into discussion on the Reggio
method. I read through the poem and the Wikipedia entry on it. As a history
teacher, I felt that context was important to understanding the motivation. In
this area hurt by World War II, the town had to really be a village that works
together to raise children. They had to work together and go on this journey of
discovering learning because the situation demanded it. I think that it has it
value, especially at the elementary levels. But teachers should be
professionals. We pursue degrees in education and content areas so that we can
useful and engaging leaders of the content we teach. I think does include
showing students my continued learning, but I do need to corral them at times
and do things are required by the school and the state. There is content that I
need to cover and get through so that they have at least exposure to it in
order to get connections and continuity at the next course.
Those are my thoughts for Monday – perhaps Tuesday will
bring on an ah-ha moment.
Keri- I was also interested in the Reggio school and the WW11 connection. I wonder if they were all shell shocked from the war and did not want to put any imposed standards on the students. The psychological shift must have been huge for everyone at that time. Allowing the students to express themselves in any way that felt right and supporting their inquiring minds is understandable for that time in history.
ReplyDeleteI think it stems from the multiple intelligence and learning with all of your senses instead of segmenting it into separate core subjects as our education system does. Our culture teaches so it makes sense to the teachers not what makes sense for the kids. A connection to art is child develops how to draw people by building with lines and shapes until an adult demonstrates using a stick figure.
ReplyDeleteOne sure thing you came up with today is a clever little name for today's reflection post ;)
ReplyDelete;)
Delete